The Credit Report Law Group is a New York-based law firm founded on the principle of consumer advocacy under federal credit reporting statutes. The firm positions itself as distinct from traditional "credit repair" companies by offering legal representation rather than dispute services, with a stated philosophy of combining professionalism and consumer protection against corporate abuse. Led by attorneys Adam G. Singer and Howard Goralnick, the firm handles cases involving inaccurate credit reports, identity theft, mixed files, employment/criminal background check errors, tenant screening errors, and data breaches—all rooted in violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Fair Credit Billing Act.
The firm's service model centers on litigation and legal advocacy rather than credit report dispute filing. They represent consumers in federal court (including Manhattan Federal Court) and pursue settlements against credit bureaus and financial institutions. A key distinction is their contingency-based fee structure: because federal and state consumer statutes allow the "wrongdoer to pay attorney's fees," the firm can represent clients without upfront costs. This model enables consumers to access legal representation for credit-related violations that might otherwise be cost-prohibitive.
What distinguishes The Credit Report Law Group is their emphasis on litigation outcomes and damage compensation rather than dispute-and-monitor approaches. Client testimonials highlight hands-on attorney involvement, meticulous case preparation, and detailed client communication throughout litigation. The firm explicitly markets itself as "better than credit repair," suggesting they view their legal advocacy as more powerful than traditional dispute mechanisms. They also offer free credit report disclosures to help clients identify violations before engaging legal services.
The primary honest caveat is that this is a litigation-based legal service, not a credit repair or credit building service. Success depends on identifying actionable violations of federal law (FCRA, FCBA) rather than simply correcting reporting errors. This means clients must have legitimate legal claims; the firm is not appropriate for consumers seeking to remove accurate negative information or build credit from scratch. Geographic limitation to New York representation and federal court jurisdiction may also restrict accessibility for some consumers.